Effects of track and rolling stock interaction on track condition and maintenance

Introduction. A number of railway lines in Russia experience increased traffic volume. The lines with the fastest annual growth are the Eastern Polygon, Transsib and BAM sections. Higher volumes of trailing load, especially in limited trafficcarrying capacity, entail longer and heavier trains and higher axle loads, which puts more strain on the existing railway infrastructure, especially the tracks. This intensifies the interaction in the wheel — rail system, further increasing track load and damage rates. This paper is intended to identify the correlation between operational factors and track load indicators.

Materials and Methods. The study of the actual damage rate on the network and the Eastern Polygon sections involved automatic devices collecting wheel — rail interaction data for several months and determined the laws and parameters of their distribution.

Results. The analysis of distribution parameters showed large variation (45–55% for average values and up to 300 % for dispersions). A similar variation was obtained for the accumulated damage and resource exhaustion rates on the investigated track sections. The work also reveals a high dependence of damage rate (from 40% and above) on the  dynamic qualities of the rolling stock determined by its design and condition. 

Discussion and Conclusion. Structural and maintenance solutions for tracks with particularly high usage require constant monitoring and analysing of the loads in the wheel — rail system. This approach would improve track design and maintenance based on the operational characteristics of specific lines for safer traffic and more efficient track maintenance and repair costs.

1. Vydashenko L.A., Vydashenko P.A., Garifullina Yu.M. Stady of the prospects of development of the Eastern polygon on the TransSiberian highway. Bulletin of Science and Practice. 2023;9(4):389-398. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/89/45.

2. Koksharov V.A. Sectorial assessment of the development of railway transport. Innovations and Investments. 2022;(11):155-158. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/lcesti.

3. Rachek S.V., Kolyshev A.S. Application of heavy-weight traffic technology on the world railways. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2016;(1):94-96. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/xdeamh.

4. Krivorotov A.A., Grigor'yeva N.N. Infrastructure of the Eastern Polygon: reality and prospects. In: Scientific, technical and economic cooperation of the Asia Pacific countries in the XXI century: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference of Creative Youth with international participation, 16–19 April 2019, Khabarovsk: 2 Vols. Khabarovsk: Far Eastern State Transport University Publ.; 2019. Vol. 1. p. 330–334. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/gpymnb.

5. Syslov O.A., Fedorova V.I. Prospective approaches to predictive modeling of degradation processes of track superstructure elements and its application in creating digital twins. Russian Railway Science Journal. 2021;80(5):251-259. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21780/2223-9731-2021-80-5-251-259.

6. Beltyukov V.P. Principles for forecasting of railway track technical condition changes. Infrastruktura transporta. 2022;(1):65-78. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/oesaox.

7. Druzhinina O.V., Gapeeva A.S., Ludagovskaya M.A. Analysis of the “railway track—rolling stock” system on the basis of methods for assessment of the impact of train loads on technical condition of track. Transport: science, equipment, management. 2019;(6):3-9. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/vafnsw.

8. Sevostyanov A.A., Velichko D.V. Process organisation modelling for maintaining rail track geometry. Russian Railway Science Journal. 2023;82(2):168-176. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21780/2223-9731-2023-82-2-168-176.

9. Beltyukov V.P., Simonyuk I.A. Concerning the improvement of medium-term track works planning. Proceedings of Petersburg Transport University. 2016;13(4):472-477. (In Russ.).

10. Baronayte R.A. Determination of the need for surfacing on railway track according to the intensity of the growth deviations. In: The railway: track to the future: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of postgraduates and young scientists, 28–29 April 2022, Moscow. Moscow: Railway Research Institute; 2022. p. 9–15. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/tpnjyo.

11. Fedorova V.I., Nazarov I. V., Gorskiy D. V. Analysis of the track condition of the eastern polygon using the V.1.0 Digital freight car in the framework of optimising the interaction of the wheel — rail system. In: Science 1520 VNIIZhT: Look beyond the horizon: Proceedings of the II International Conference, 24–25 August 2023, Moscow. Moscow: Railway Research Institute; 2023. p. 275–283. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/kglsbb.

12. Verigo M.F., Kogan A.Ya. Track and rolling stock interaction. Moscow: Transport Publ.; 1986. 558 p. (In Russ.).

13. Huesmann H., Beck A. The wheel and rail system in terms of railway facilities. Zheleznyye dorogi mira. 2005;(10):12. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/hsxxoj.

14. Vinogradov S.A., Sukhov A.V., Lunin A.A., Suslov O.A., Nazarov I.V., Zagranichek K.L. Improvement of wheel and rail interaction. Zheleznodorozhnyy transport. 2023;(3):37-45. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/pevfyz.