Preview

RUSSIAN RAILWAY SCIENCE JOURNAL

Advanced search

Strength and stability of continuous welded rail track of ballastless track superstructure of Moscow – Saint Petersburg high-speed main line

https://doi.org/10.21780/2223-9731-2025-84-4-262-272

Abstract

Introduction. The development of high-speed main line with the speed up to 400 km/h is strictly connected with the major problem of insufficient normative technical documentation which regulates methodology of railway design calculation, including stability from extreme temperature and strength under its combined action with rolling stock. The aim of the article is to develop methodology for assessing the stress-strain state of a continuous welded rail track on a ballastless track based on strength and stability, as well as to assess temperature release risks and loss of rail string strength.

Materials and methods. In order to calculate continuous welded rail track for stability the authors employed method which involves accounting for rail string initial unstressed unevenness of the most unfavorable shape. Finite element method was used to estimate continuous welded rail track strength.

Results. The calculations show that the permissible temperature increase of rail string in comparison with fixing temperature under the terms of stability may be equivalent to 111 °С, and permissible temperature decrease of the rail string is 98 °С, which is comparable to the traditional track design on a ballast.

Discussion and conclusion. Ballastless design of the superstructure, required by documentation, has greater stability capacity in comparison with traditional design on a ballast. Technical solutions of ballastless track design of superstructure on pointless sections placed on roadbed nearly eliminate risks of mechanical safety violation both in terms of strength and stability. As a part of experimental operation of high-speed railway line on Sablino – Tosno space interval and Alabushevo – Novaya Tver section, analytically calculated temperature increase value of rail string in terms of fixing temperature under the terms of stability and temperature decrease value of rail string in comparison with the fixing temperature under the terms of strength using finite element modelling should be proven experimentally.

About the Authors

A. V. Romanov
Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University
Russian Federation

Andrei V. Romanov, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Head of Railway Track Department

190031, Saint Petersburg, 9, Moskovsky Ave.



A. A. Kiselev
Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University
Russian Federation

Artyom A. Kiselev, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor, Railway Track Department

190031, Saint Petersburg, 9, Moskovsky Ave.



References

1. Kogan A.Ya. Railway track dynamics and its interaction with rolling stock. Proceedings of JSC VNIIZHT Series. Moscow: KUNA, 2023. 280 p. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/mdkaov.

2. Pershin S.P. Methods for calculating the stability of continuous welded rail (CWR) track. Proceedings of MIIT. Railway Track and Facilities. Moscow. 1962;(147):28–97. (In Russ.).

3. Kogan A.Ya. Longitudinal forces in the railway track. Proceedings of VNIIZHT. Issue 332. Moscow: Transport, 1967. 168 p. (In Russ.).

4. Kreynis Z.L. On the dynamic stability of the railway track. Herald of TsNII of the Ministry of Railways of the USSR. 1963;(8):58–61. (In Russ.).

5. Krivobodorov A.A. Stability of the railway track under thermal forces in rails. Proceedings of LIIZT. Leningrad. 1952;(144):120–154. (In Russ.).

6. Bromberg E.M. Stability of continuous welded rail track. Proceedings of VNIIZHT. Moscow: Transport, 1966. 67 р. (In Russ.).

7. Suslov O.A. Estimation of probable distortion of a continuous welded track of temperature-strained type. Volga Region Transport Herald. 2014;4(46):50–56. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/swjhpx.

8. Suslov O.A. Strategy of monitoring and routine maintenance of continuous welded rails on the network of JSC “Russian Railways”. Volga Region Transport Herald. 2014;4(46):69–73. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/swjhrl.

9. Suslov O.A., Sedelkin Yu.A., Atapin V.V. Analysis of continuous welded rail track stability based on data from modern diagnostic tools. Railway Track and Facilities. 2015;(11):22–28. (In Russ.). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vbckzp.

10. Strauss A., Šomodíková M., Lehký D., Novák D., Bergmeister K. Nonlinear finite element analysis of continuous welded rail–bridge interaction: monitoring-based calibration. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2018;24(4):344–354. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2018.3050.

11. N.-H. Lim, N.-H. Park, Yo.-J. Kang. Stability of continuous welded rail track. Computers & Structures. 2003;81(22–23):2219–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00287-6.

12. Альбрехт В.Г., Коган А.Я. и др. Бесстыковой путь. М.: Транспорт, 2000. 408 с. Albrecht V.G., Kogan A.Ya. et al. Welded rail track. Moscow: Transport, 2000. 408 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Romanov A.V., Kiselev A.A. Strength and stability of continuous welded rail track of ballastless track superstructure of Moscow – Saint Petersburg high-speed main line. RUSSIAN RAILWAY SCIENCE JOURNAL. 2025;84(4):262-272. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21780/2223-9731-2025-84-4-262-272

Views: 32


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-9731 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2560 (Online)