Preview

RUSSIAN RAILWAY SCIENCE JOURNAL

Advanced search

Optimization of an EMU train carbody by the value of the natural bending frequency

https://doi.org/10.21780/2223-9731-2021-80-3-152-159

Abstract

Finding ways to optimize the body structure is an important point in the design of new electric train cars. Reducing the mass of the body leads to a lightening of the parts of the rolling stock associated with it, a reduction in energy consumption for operation and a decrease in wear in the “wheel — rail”system. Reducing the weight of the body is possible by assigning optimal rigidity to its main load-bearing elements. Increasing the rigidity of the body with a constant mass is also an important task to obtain the standard dynamic properties of the car body.

The article presents method for optimizing the body structure based on calculating the value of its first frequency of natural bending vibrations. The calculation was carried out by the finite element method using a simplified beam-shell parametric model. Within the optimization calculations, 3125 working versions of sections of the main load-bearing structural elements with different rigidity were considered — bracing and cross-beams of the frame, inter-window racks and cross-beams of the roof. The sensitivity of the value of the natural vibration frequency to the change in the rigidity of the main bearing elements without taking into account the change in mass is analyzed. It was found that the rigidity of the frame bracing and cross beams has the greatest influence on the frequency value. It is shown that the ratio of the rigidity of the main bearing elements does not remain constant for optimal design options and depends on the design of the body, the target values of its mass and rigidity. When mass is limited, it is possible to choose designs that are characterized by the greatest overall body rigidity and are the most optimal in terms of manufacturability. By limiting the values of natural vibration frequency, it is possible to choose a body structure with the lowest metal mass. The presented approach allows making decisions on body modification based on the required parameters of mass and (or) the frequency of natural bending vibrations. This approach can be used in pre-design studies of the bodies of new passenger rolling stock.

About the Author

R. V. Guchinsky
Limited liability company “TMH Engineering” (TMH Engineering Ltd); Institute of Problems of Mechanical Engineering of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPME RAS)
Russian Federation

Ruslan V. Guchinsky, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Expert of the Carbody Bureau; Senior Researcher, Applied Research Laboratory

St. Petersburg, 199178, Russia

St. Petersburg, 197046, Russia



References

1. Cho J. G., Koo J. S., Jung H. S. A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 673 – 681.

2. Singh D. Comparison of carbon steel and composite side wall of light rail vehicle by finite element analysis. Thesis of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering. Texas, Arlington, 2017, 59 p.

3. Seo S. I., Kim J. S., Cho S. H. Development of a hybrid composite bodyshell for tilting trains. Proceedings Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2008, Vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 1 – 13.

4. Wennberg D., Stichel S. Multi-functional design of a composite high-speed train body structure. Struct Multidisc Optim, 2013, Vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 475 – 488.

5. Koenig J., Friedrich H. E. Integral consideration of the lightweight design for railway vehicles. Rep. German Aerospace Center — Institute of Vehicle Concepts. [S. l.], 2012, 13 p.

6. Lee H. A., Jung S. B., Jang H. H., Shin D. H. Structural-optimization- based design process for the body of a railway vehicle made from extruded aluminum panels. Proceedings Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2015, Vol. 230, no. 4, pp. 1283 – 1296.

7. De La Guerra E. Lightweight primary structures for Highspeed railway carbodies. 360.revista de alta velocidad, 2018, no. 5, pp. 9 – 21.

8. Skachkov A. N., Samoshkin S. L., Korshunov S. D., Lomakov P. S., Zhukov A. S. Opredelenie parametrov izgibnykh kolebaniy kuzovov vagonov i otsenka khodovykh dinamicheskikh i ekspluatatsionnykh pokazateley elektropoezda novogo pokoleniya [Determination of the parameters of bending vibrations of car bodies and assessment of the running dynamic and operational indicators of a new generation electric train]. Vestnik RGUPS, 2018, no. 4, pp. 78 – 87.

9. GOST 34093–2017. Passenger cars on locomotive traction. Requirements for structural strength and dynamic qualities. Interstate standard, put into effect as nat. standard of the Russian Federation by order of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology dated June 13, 2017 No. 537-st. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2017, 41 p. (in Russ.).

10. GOST 33796–2016. Railway multiple units. Durability and dynamics requirements. Interstate standard, put into effect as nat. standard of the Russian Federation by order of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology dated July 4, 2016 No. 800-st. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2016, 35 p. (in Russ.).

11. Prager V. Osnovy teorii optimal'nogo proektirovaniya konstruktsiy [Fundamentals of the theory of optimal design of structures]. Mekhanika. Novoe v zarubezhnoy nauke; vyp. 11 [Mechanics. New in foreign science; no. 11]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1977, 109 p.

12. Haryanto I., Raharjo F. Optimization of Bus Body Frame Structure for Weight Minimizing with Constraint of Natural Frequency using Adaptive Single-Objective Method. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Technology, 2018, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9 – 14.

13. Adduri P., Leiva J., Quinn G., Watson B. Car Body Optimization Considering Crashworthiness, NVH and Static Responses. Proceedings of 13th Int. LS-DYNA Users Conf. Dearborn, USA, 2014, pp. 1 – 8.

14. Bulychev M. A., Lozbinev V. P. Sovershenstvovanie sposobov rascheta i optimizatsii nesushchikh elementov kuzovov vagonov [Improvement of methods of calculation and optimization of loadbearing elements of car bodies]. Mekhanika vagonov. Sb. nauch. tr. [Mechanics of cars. Coll. of scientific papers]. Bryanskiy gos. tekhn. un-t [Bryansk State Technical University], Bryansk, BGTU Publ., 1998, pp. 36 – 47.

15. Tyutyunnikov A. I. Strukturno-parametricheskaya optimizatsiya nesushchikh konstruktsiy kuzovov gruzovykh vagonov putem evolyutsionnogo modelirovaniya. Avtoref. dis. … kand. tekhn. nauk [Structural-parametric optimization of load-bearing structures of freight car bodies by evolutionary modeling. Cand. tech. sci. diss. synopsis]. Bryansk, BGTU Publ., 2011, 20 p.

16. Guchinsky R. V., Petinov S. V. Development of the vessel structure assembly according to the fatigue life condition. Scientific and technical bulletins of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 2012, no. 4 (159), pp. 177 – 186.

17. Guchinsky R. V. Calculation of the frequency of natural bending vibrations of the body of an electric train car taking into account the flexibility of the supports. Herald of the Ural State University of Railway Transport, 2019, no. 2 (42), pp. 4 – 11.

18. Sun W., Zhou J., Gong D., You T. Analysis of modal frequency optimization of railway vehicle car body. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1 – 12.

19. Guchinsky R. V., Petinov S. V. Preliminary calculation of the frequency of natural bending vibrations of bodies of electric train cars. Bulletin of the Institute of Natural Monopolies Problems: Railway Engineering, 2019, no. 2 (46), pp. 50 – 57.


Review

For citations:


Guchinsky R.V. Optimization of an EMU train carbody by the value of the natural bending frequency. RUSSIAN RAILWAY SCIENCE JOURNAL. 2021;80(3):152-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21780/2223-9731-2021-80-3-152-159

Views: 588


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-9731 (Print)
ISSN 2713-2560 (Online)